Skip to content

[frontend] Fix Specific Workflow for Request Access not shown in settings (#16017)#16099

Open
fellowseb wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
issue/16017-broken-request-access
Open

[frontend] Fix Specific Workflow for Request Access not shown in settings (#16017)#16099
fellowseb wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
issue/16017-broken-request-access

Conversation

@fellowseb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fellowseb fellowseb commented May 20, 2026

Proposed changes

Related issues

Test instructions

  • Go to Settings > Customization > Request for information
  • The workflow tab should have a specific working "Specific Workflow for Request Access" section

Checklist

  • I consider the submitted work as finished
  • I tested the code for its functionality
  • I wrote test cases for the relevant uses case (coverage and e2e)
  • I added/update the relevant documentation (either on github or on notion)
  • Where necessary I refactored code to improve the overall quality

Further comments

I considered (and tried) doing the EE check in the backend but it has a lot more implications as we are creating request-access-related entities during the init stage. Also correctly handling a CE -> EE transition at runtime without a restart of the platform would be involved. Before the regression the check was done in the UI too.

@fellowseb fellowseb self-assigned this May 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the filigran team use to identify PR from the Filigran team label May 20, 2026
@fellowseb fellowseb marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2026 21:56
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 27.90%. Comparing base (4a89265) to head (93ec7bd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #16099   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.89%   27.90%           
=======================================
  Files        3232     3232           
  Lines      221679   221681    +2     
  Branches    37939    37944    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        61840    61858   +18     
+ Misses     159839   159823   -16     
Flag Coverage Δ
opencti-client-python 46.36% <ø> (ø)
opencti-front 3.99% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
opencti-graphql 54.58% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@fellowseb fellowseb force-pushed the issue/16017-broken-request-access branch from 6f29697 to 8a67c2c Compare May 20, 2026 23:22
@fellowseb fellowseb force-pushed the issue/16017-broken-request-access branch from 8a67c2c to 93ec7bd Compare May 21, 2026 06:23
@fellowseb fellowseb requested a review from esrevi May 21, 2026 06:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

filigran team use to identify PR from the Filigran team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Request Access: not possible to define/update the request access flow

1 participant